Stone Crusher Association v. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by. Kishan Swaroop Chaudhari, J.:— These appeals have been filed by the appellants against a common judgment dated 26th July, 2004 passed by learned Single Judge in SBCWP No. 1065/2003 - Stone Crusher Association v.State Of Rajasthan & Ors. and SBCWP No. 1066/2002 - Rajasthan Half Body Truck Union …
stone+crusher | Indian Case Law
Grievance in this application is against operation of mining lease and stone crusher called M/s Jagdamba Stone Crusher Unit-II at Khasra Nos. 7,65/6, 8, 28, Village & Mausa …
Supreme Court Judgements/ Orders
The appeal by MoEFCC was filed against a judgment of the National Green Tribunal ("NGT"), which directed stone crushing units to obtain environment clearance. The Court also noted that …
supreme court judgement of stone crusher that crushed stone …
supreme court judgement of stone crusher that crushed stone is not manufacturing goods M/S. D.J Stone Crusher v. Commissioner Of Income Tax. 20091216 The observation of the Supreme Court cannot be termed to be 'obiter dicta' since the Supreme Court has held that the process of concrete by stone crushers is a manufacturing process.
M/S GRUHA BHAUTIKA SUPPLIERS v. SHREE DARUKA STONE CRUSHER
jai balaji stone crusher unit, having its registered office at. no.001, jayashree building, shanti colony south, vidya nagar, hubli, dharwad - 580 021. 6. mr. abhinav patil, s/o chandrakant patil, partner, p and a stone crusher unit trade name. jai balaji stone crusher unit. 7. mr. sanket, s/o shrinath mugali, partner, p and a stone crusher ...
State of Uttarakhand & Ors. Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher [SEPTEMBER 15
All the writ petitioners supported the judgment of Uttarakhand High Court dated 01.07.2004 in M/s Kumaon Stone Crusher wherein, the High Court has held that no levy of Transit Fee can be made on the finished items of stone i.e. stone grits, sand grits & chips etc.
Court No.
Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25003 of 2023 Petitioner :- Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Udit …
Guljama Shah Jahir Shah vs Shri Sadguru Kaka Stone Crusher
JUDGMENT/ORDER 1. Rule. Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally, with the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. By means of this Petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dtd. 20/12/2022 (Exh.19) passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Khamgaon in Summary Criminal Case No.694/2022 thereby allowing the application filed by …
Supreme Court Stone Crusher
Out of the 210 stone-crusher units violating siting criteria, 106 units have obtained interim protection from the Supreme Court and the Punjab and Haryana High Court. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s.
M/S OM STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
(ii) To grant the benefit of seniority, promotion, increments, grade pay, earned leave benefits, pay fixation as higher grade pay along with all consequential benefits w.e.f. the date of initial appointment of the petitioner keeping in view the settled law because the case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Hon'ble ...
M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Ors | Judgments | Supreme …
Writ Petitions were filed before this Court, challenging the action of the owners/proprietors of the stone-crushers whereby stone-dust and smoke was allowed to pass …
stone crusher supreme court judgement
stone crusher doctypes: judgments - Indian Kanoon - Search … State Government was of the opinion that the stone crushers units in the State of Haryana have been causing grave ...
Himalaya Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Uttarakhand
Get free access to the complete judgment in Himalaya Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd. v. State Of Uttarakhand on CaseMine.
SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN (Appellate Jurisdiction)
among the residents and the workers of the stone-crushing plants." (See Schedule B of the Order for details). 3. Thereafter, not satisfied with the performance of the power crushers and in order to delve deeper into the issue of environmental degradation in …
Judgment Sheet IN THE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, …
i. Hazara Stone Crusher. ii. AnsarMajeed Khan Stone Crusher. iii. Gujjar Stone Crusher. He has also stated that pursuant to the judgment of august Supreme Court of Pakistan operations of the said crushermachines were stopped. Similarly, the Environment Department of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Respondents no. 7 & 8,
Laxmi Narayan Stone Crusher v. District Magistrate
Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral):— According to the petitioner, he runs a stone crusher in District Haridwar. On 02.04.2017, an inspection was made in the premises of the petitioner by the Geology Department as well as by the Department of Mining, wherein it was found by the authorities that the petitioner was engaged in illegal mining activities.
M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 …
Himachal Pradesh High Court M/S Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers vs . Uoi & Ors. on 7 November, 2023 Bench: Mamidanna Satya Ratna Sri Ramachandra Rao, Jyotsna Rewal Dua M/s Lakhwinder Sigh Stone Crushers Vs.UOI & Ors.. CWP No.8637 of 2023 . 07.11.2023 Present: Mr. Sahil Singla, Mr. Sachit Singla and Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocates, for the petitioner.
JUDGMENT/ORDER IN
The petitioners stone crushers have been established after obtaining no objection certificate from U.P. Pollution Control Board and all other relevant authorities and they cannot be stopped from running the stone crushers. The apex Court in PIL W.P(C)No.651/2005 NEELAMBAR BABA & ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS has not passed any order for ...
Sunrise Stone Crusher Pvt. Ltd . v. State Of U.P. And Others
Lastly, it was urged that by the Government Order dated 31 December, 2018 the stone crusher industry was not included within the ambit of the Rules, 2018, however, the stone crusher industry was included vide Government Order dated 09 March, 2019 as well as by amendment w.e.f. 20 December, 2018, the date when the Rules, 2018 was introduced ...
Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of Andhra Pradesh
The petitioner relied upon a judgment of a learned Single Judge of this Court in Sree Srinivasa Stone Crusher v. State Of A.P. 4386. This case relates to the petitioner herein himself.
M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA …
Get free access to the complete judgment in M/S. SHRIGONDA STONE CRUSHER v. MAHARASHTRA POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD on CaseMine. ... Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a …
Mohit Stone Crusher v. Phool Singh & Ors. | Punjab & Haryana High Court
Union of India 1992 SCC 256 as also notification dated 18.12.1992 issued by the Government of Haryana came to the conclusion that installing of stone crusher was actionable nuisance and was otherwise in violation of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the judgment passed by this Court and accordingly restrained the petitioners ...
Supreme Court of India
Some Writ Petitions, which were filled by the owners/proprietors of stone-crushers in the Delhi High Court and which have been directed to be transferred to this Court are dismissed. [360 E] …
State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 …
Supreme Court - Daily Orders State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 27 July, 2017 ... No(s). 19445/2004 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-07-2004 in WP No. 1124/2001 passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital) STATE OF UTTARANCHAL & ORS. ...
JUDGMENT/ORDER IN
Writ petition No. 57358 of 2010 (hereinafter referred to as first writ petition) has been filed by 12 stone crushers situated in district Mathura, challenging the orders passed by the District …
State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher
Latest Judgments State of Uttaranchal & Ors. v. M/s. Kumaon Stone Crusher. November 26, 2021. Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19445/2004. Learned counsel for the parties submit that in some of these matters pleadings are not yet complete.
Procedural Laws Vol. 4: No. 38
The High Court of Allahabad ("HC"), on November 21, 2023, in the Maa Vindhya Stone Crusher Company case, 1 reiterated the importance of following principles of natural justice in quasi …
M/s CHANGER STONE CRUSHER v. STATE OF HP AND ORS
3. judgment, however, all rights and contentions of the parties be left open for decision. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representations of the petitioners dated 10.09.2024 …
Anu Stone Crusher & Etc. v. Bank Of India & Ors.
(1) The order passed in writ petition no. 5768/2008 (m/s, anu stone crusher v. Bank of india and others) will also govern the disposal of wrti petition no. 5770/2008 (M/s. Bajaj Stone Crusher v. Bank of India and others) and writ petition no. 5781/2008 (m/s. Saroj stone crusher v. Bank of india and others).
Judgment Sheet IN THE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, …
pursuant to the judgment of august Supreme Court of Pakistan. Whereas, Respondent No.5, Secretary Industries Department, stated in his para-wise comments that there are three …